How to Use the Ideas Feature
What you need to know about Docusign Community IdeasThis guide will walk you through the process of sharing your ideas, voting on existing ideas, and...
20310
Want to shape the future of Docusign? Add your ideas for dream features and upvote others you love.
It would be great if one could have the Administrative Assistant of a Signatory receive the same initial notification that the Signatory receives when a document is submitted through Docusign. When I set them up to “Receive a Copy” that happens too late in the process to be effective.Thanks!
It would be great if the Update Recipient role included the ability to update the recipient’s witness, rather than just the signer details. A big, household name client has requested this.
I searched on this forum for other people who might be experiencing the same frustration, and I was surprised that I didn’t find anything similar. The new homepage/dashboard for Docusign is not intuitive, and quite frankly, I hate it. Mainly: Numbers overview of envelopes: I think the default used to be 6 months, but it has now changed to 30 days. I tried to go into the settings to see if this could be changed, but it doesn’t look like you can. “Action Needed” category removed: This caused me to miss out on issues with delivery, and some signatures were severely delayed. There are seasons where my firm is dealing with hundreds of DocuSign envelopes at a time, and having this section was extremely helpful. Drag and drop: I assume the drag and drop feature was taken away to add the options to create a web form and create a document template. However, when dealing with hundreds of Docusigns, the small amount of time saved per envelope adds up. I understand products change overtime, and user interfaces need to change along with that. However, I think this was a change in the wrong direction. I would like to see homepage customization options in the future.
all I keep seeing online are apologies as to how you can’t make them stop, despite requests specifically to do so - it’s annoying and WE PAY for this service - you should listen to your customers
Right now this is the only formatting.It would be nice to allow for the transparent background of the text and the ability to make the background of the text another color. Right now it looks like this:
PLEASE add a turn off box for the new notification every time you move an envelope to another folder as it is SUPER ANNOYING!! It stays there until you close out EVERY popup notification.
We want to create a template with word document and the sender text tags will have values varying from 10 to 50 characters, so we tried using Agreement Template Builder but Approve and Decline buttons are not available. If we use classic editor, we can have Approve and Decline buttons, but the content is the word document is static. If the word document content is static and in the sender text tags is having less characters, empty space is visible and when the characters are more, text is overlapping on the content.
Problem:CLM Attribute groups display all fields regardless of relevance, creating clutter and increasing user error.Proposed Solution:Enable rule-based visibility (e.g., IF Field A = “Yes” THEN show Field B).
Problem:Currently, auto-renewal CLM attribute in contracts is not represented as a dedicated boolean attribute in the XML/data model (for example in xml output of step find document). Instead, it is implicitly derived from related fields such as auto_renewal_count and auto_renewal_unit. This creates challenges when building workflows or performing change detection, as users must implement custom logic to infer whether auto-renewal is enabled or disabled.Proposed Solution:Introduce a dedicated boolean attribute (e.g., autoRenewalFlag) in the CLM data model and XML output:true → auto-renewal is enabled false → auto-renewal is not enabled
ProblemIn the current CLM design, the Auto Renewal Term Count field:Only accepts positive integers (1, 2, 3, etc.) Cannot be set to 0 Cannot be cleared (set back to blank) once populated via the Edit CLM Agreement Attributes workflow step The same limitation applies to Auto Renewal Term Unit and auto renewal yes/noThis creates friction when agreements need to:Remove auto-renewal behavior Transition from renewable → non-renewable contracts Correct data entry mistakes via workflow automation
I have about 3000 documents all needed to be signed by the same person and have inserted signed date. All documents are identical conserning the location of the signature and the date. As of now all the documents have to be signes individually. I am looking for a “sign once, apply to all” function
Hello, I would like a way for a signatory to make a single signature, automatically replicating that same action across multiple envelopes for mass mailings. At our institution, directors sign many documents, which ends up taking up a lot of their time. Currently, we have about 477 documents to sign. Replication would make our daily work easier. Would this improvement be possible?
Today, Access Codes are set per recipient, which gets painful when an envelope has multiple recipients (repetitive setup, easy to miss someone, hard to manage).Request:Add an envelope-level option: “Require access code for this envelope” → automatically applies to all recipients. Add an option to send the access code in a separate DocuSign system email, so it’s not included in the envelope invitation/email thread (helps when invitations get forwarded).This would reduce admin effort, improve consistency, and strengthen real-world security.





Docusign Community
Code of ConductAlready have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK