Get Started
Get Inspiration
Groups
Events
Ideas
Release Hub

Start a Post
Log in

Docusign Momentum 2026 | New York City

(Wed, May 20, 12:00 PM)

Home
Ideas

Ideas

Want to shape the future of Docusign? Add your ideas for dream features and upvote others you love.

Featured topics

How to Use the Ideas Feature

What you need to know about Docusign Community IdeasThis guide will walk you through the process of sharing your ideas, voting on existing ideas, and...

Forum|Forum|1 year ago

20430

Update on the status of submitted ideas

Hi everyone! We’ve heard your questions about the status of submitted ideas in the Ideas forum.Internally, the Docusign team is actively reviewing you...

Forum|Forum|11 months ago

5758

Filter by Idea status

Filter by category

858 Ideas

Newest First

Most Replies

Most Votes

JennieBbytheSeaNewcomer

MAKE THE TIPS STOP for the LOVE OF GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Idea Submitted

all I keep seeing online are apologies as to how you can’t make them stop, despite requests specifically to do so - it’s annoying and WE PAY for this service - you should listen to your customers

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

mshealyEstablished Contributor

Formatting of fields needs transparent and color change ability for backgroundParked

Right now this is the only formatting.It would be nice to allow for the transparent background of the text and the ability to make the background of the text another color. Right now it looks like this:

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

RasmuselmNewcomer

Ability to merge two files before sendingIdea Submitted

I use Docusign to sign Minutes from board meetings. I would like to upload the minutes in a word document and the I have a template with all the names on the BoD members and auto-filled areas for them to sign. I would like to be able to merge the two files before sending, so the BoD members read the minutes and then the signing page is in the same document and then sign in the same document It does not work to send those files seperately as BoD members need to see that it is the exact minutes that they are signing and therefore it is not helpful you can download after signing and merge into one file. The workaround with an editable template where I add the minutes on top of the “pre-defined signing page” is also very clunky and does not work for me

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

CDextrousNewcomer

Save template without exiting.Idea Submitted

After creating a new template, if I need to edit the document within it, I click the “Next” button to edit, and begin editing the document and adding fields. The only way to save my work is to save and exit, meaning every time I want to save, I have to close the document and then open it back up again.Please introduce a “Save” button that allows the user to continue with their work, or even just a keyboard shortcut Ctrl+S so that we can save when we need to, and keep editing.I’ve lost 2+ hours’ work, twice, in two days… once because my window went idle, and the next because of an error saying “something went wrong”. A Ctrl+S would have prevented this.

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

SandeepPonkalaNewcomer

Approve and Decline buttons with the Agreement Template builder.Idea Submitted

We want to create a template with word document and the sender text tags will have values varying from 10 to 50 characters, so we tried using Agreement Template Builder but Approve and Decline buttons are not available. If we use classic editor, we can have Approve and Decline buttons, but the content is the word document is static. If the word document content is static and in the sender text tags is having less characters, empty space is visible and when the characters are more, text is overlapping on the content.

Forum|Forum|13 days ago

TDIBENZNewcomer

Feature Request: Auto-Center Text Within Recipient FieldsIdea Submitted

Feature Request: Auto-Center Text Within Recipient FieldsI would like to request the ability to automatically center-align text entered by recipients within text, name, and checkbox-related fields.Currently, while fields themselves can be aligned on the document canvas, the actual user-entered content inside the fields is always left-aligned. This creates formatting inconsistencies when recipient names, initials, addresses, or other variable-length entries differ in size and character count.A field-level setting such as:Horizontal text alignment: Left / Center / Right Vertical alignment options Auto-center within field boundarieswould significantly improve document presentation and professionalism, especially for:Official forms Agreements Certificates Applications Signature packets with structured layoutsThis would be particularly valuable for users creating highly formatted templates where visual symmetry matters and recipient-entered content varies from signer to signer.Ideally, this could function similarly to text alignment settings in standard document editors, while dynamically adapting to different text lengths entered by recipients.This enhancement would greatly improve formatting consistency and reduce the need for manual field resizing and positioning workarounds.

Forum|Forum|13 days ago

Jeremy G.Newcomer

Using RON with DocuSign in Virtual EnvironmentIdea Submitted

Hello!I work at a law firm where everyone here logs in to their pcs virtually. We have recently started to receive requests for remote online notarization. I think RON with DocuSign works great for this! However, because our environment is virtual, we are not able to utilize the technology required by RON while logged in to our computers. We currently have to perform the RON task outside of our virtual environment via a laptop, or one of our conference room computers. Fingers crossed this can work for us virtual folks someday!

Forum|Forum|14 days ago

daniel.krcmarDigital Collaborator

Conditional Field within CLM Attribute GroupsIdea Submitted

Problem:CLM Attribute groups display all fields regardless of relevance, creating clutter and increasing user error.Proposed Solution:Enable rule-based visibility (e.g., IF Field A = “Yes” THEN show Field B).

Forum|Forum|14 days ago

daniel.krcmarDigital Collaborator

Add Auto-Renewal Boolean CLM Attribute to CLM Data ModelIdea Submitted

Problem:Currently, auto-renewal CLM attribute in contracts is not represented as a dedicated boolean attribute in the XML/data model (for example in xml output of step find document). Instead, it is implicitly derived from related fields such as auto_renewal_count and auto_renewal_unit. This creates challenges when building workflows or performing change detection, as users must implement custom logic to infer whether auto-renewal is enabled or disabled.Proposed Solution:Introduce a dedicated boolean attribute (e.g., autoRenewalFlag) in the CLM data model and XML output:true → auto-renewal is enabled false → auto-renewal is not enabled

Forum|Forum|14 days ago

daniel.krcmarDigital Collaborator

Allow Clearing or Setting Auto Renewal Term Count to 0 or autorenewal to no in CLM WorkflowIdea Submitted

ProblemIn the current CLM design, the Auto Renewal Term Count field:Only accepts positive integers (1, 2, 3, etc.) Cannot be set to 0 Cannot be cleared (set back to blank) once populated via the Edit CLM Agreement Attributes workflow step The same limitation applies to Auto Renewal Term Unit and auto renewal yes/noThis creates friction when agreements need to:Remove auto-renewal behavior Transition from renewable → non-renewable contracts Correct data entry mistakes via workflow automation

Forum|Forum|14 days ago

j.brown7New Voice

Please implement Scheduled Sending for Shared AccessIdea Submitted

Good afternoon,On this page -- Shared Access to Envelopes -- it states that Shared Access currently does not support scheduled sending. I would like to request this as a feature as we have some staff where this is incredibly helpful because they need to send some templates from a Shared Access account and being able to schedule when they are sending those documents helps for many policy reasons and just for general timing purposes as well.It is an incredibly useful feature and is supported when you are sending from your account, so it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense that it is not a feature with Shared Access.

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

SGBNew Voice

One-Click Signing for Multi-Page Signature FieldsDuplicate

Our primary document (SPA) contains signature placeholders on every page, and the document length can vary between 10 to 50 pages. At present, the signing experience requires users to manually click and apply signatures on each page, which is not user-friendly—especially for customers handling longer documents. I would like to explore if there are options or possible customizations to enhance the user experience with the following capabilities: Allow the customer to review the entire document and apply the signature once at the end, which automatically populates all signature placeholders across the document. Provide a consent checkbox at the end (e.g., “I confirm that I have read the complete document”) and, upon acceptance, allow a single signature action that reflects across all required fields/pages.

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

henrikcareliusNewcomer

“sign once, apply to all” - functionIdea Submitted

I have about 3000 documents all needed to be signed by the same person and have inserted signed date. All documents are identical conserning the location of the signature and the date. As of now all the documents have to be signes individually. I am looking for a “sign once, apply to all” function

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

FABIO.TIAGONewcomer

Signature replicationDuplicate

Hello, I would like a way for a signatory to make a single signature, automatically replicating that same action across multiple envelopes for mass mailings. At our institution, directors sign many documents, which ends up taking up a lot of their time. Currently, we have about 477 documents to sign. Replication would make our daily work easier. Would this improvement be possible?

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

orengalikiNewcomer

Envelope-level access code + send the code in a separate DocuSign emailIdea Submitted

Today, Access Codes are set per recipient, which gets painful when an envelope has multiple recipients (repetitive setup, easy to miss someone, hard to manage).Request:Add an envelope-level option: “Require access code for this envelope” → automatically applies to all recipients. Add an option to send the access code in a separate DocuSign system email, so it’s not included in the envelope invitation/email thread (helps when invitations get forwarded).This would reduce admin effort, improve consistency, and strengthen real-world security.

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

Richard.FellaNewcomer

Sender Pre-fill Custom FieldsIdea Submitted

I want to be able to create custom text fields (addresses of property’s) so that they can be selected as required into a Sender pre-fill text box. Currently this is not possible under the Sender Prefill “user” as far as I can see. I can only create them under my own name. If this is possible I would be delighted to hear how to do this. If not, DocuSign developers can you get this implemented asap. Thanks Richard

Forum|Forum|16 days ago

Cdamro00Newcomer

Webform notifications when a form is filled outIdea Submitted

The inability to get an email notification when a Public webform (created from scratch) is filled out is mind boggling. Like if there is a public webform people want to know when it’s been completed. I actually created 2 cases to get help with this because I didn’t believe the first support person when I was told it wasn’t possible. just to be clearI created a webform from scratch. It’s public facing, and does not require a signature. when it’s filled out by a customer there is now way for me to get a notification. unbelievable

Forum|Forum|19 days ago

NBKPRNew Voice

Web Form Subject Limited to 100 Characters - Increase to 225 CharactersDuplicate

The Web Form Subject is limited to 100 characters. Please increase this option to 225 characters in order to accommodate a formula to pull information from the form as the subject as exampled below. I would like to have the ability to ender the following as my web form subject:[[ECF:Travel Start Date]]_[[ECF:Initiator_UserName]]_NTA Form_[[ECF:Name of Travel Destination]]_[ECF:Destination City Name]]_[[ECF:Destination State Abbreviation]]The results would be as follows:YYYYMMDD_abcdefg_hijklmnopq_NTA Form_Docusign_Web_Form_Conference_San_Diego_CA012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890The above is 80 characters which would fit in the allotted 100-character subject limit.The character limit could be longer based in the information filled but I cannot see it being longer than 225 characters.Thank you for taking the time to read this suggestion for improvement

Forum|Forum|19 days ago

NBKPRNew Voice

Web Form Subject Limited to 100 Characters - Increase to 225 CharactersIdea Submitted

Forum|Forum|19 days ago

PaysafeRamaNewcomer

Dynamic brand logo display on a docusign templateIdea Submitted

Problem:We currently work with six banks, each having its own MPA PDF format. Additionally, we have 200+ partners whose MPAs follow the same structure and mapping, but each partner requires different header and footer branding. Because of this variability, adding static headers and footers in the source Word file is not feasible. Maintaining over 200 partner–bank combinations as separate documents is not scalable and would be extremely difficult to manage in real time. Previously, we only had five banks and four partners (20 combinations), which was manageable. Now, with a significantly larger set, we require the ability to insert header/footer images dynamically—similar to how we already populate text using text tabs.Our configuration:We are using DocuSign Envelope Templates in a partially customized setup. Envelope creation is triggered via ApexToolkit because some related objects are not directly connected to Salesforce Contract records.Idea:We need the capability to dynamically insert header and footer images into the document at runtime through the API, similar to the way dynamic text tabs or signature tabs are currently supported.

Forum|Forum|20 days ago

DHillNewcomer

Fixing inefficiencies in Navigator Agreement TaggingIdea Submitted

I am working on editing the labels to some of my documents in the Miscellaneous agreement type in Navigator, specifically to update the agreement type. I can click on documents by checking the box next to file name, then going to "edit" and editing the agreement type. However, I have noticed some inefficiencies in this process: (1) I can only select 50 agreements at a time to update the "agreement type" using the "edit" function. (2) When I click "save' and then "Update agreement type," the Docusign page takes me back to item 1, page 1 of the Miscellaneous folder, not where I left off in the Miscellaneous folder, and (3) there is no way to go to a later item in the Miscellaneous folder besides clicking the forward arrow on the bottom of the table. For example, I can't view or go to "items 950-1000". These fixes would make it more efficient to update agreement type of document (or any other labels): (1) unlimited number of agreements to edit/relabel at one time, (2) Having Docusign take you back to the page you previously were on when you click “save,” not to the beginning of the folder, and (3) Allowing users to select a range of document numbers to go to without just relying on the arrow.

Forum|Forum|21 days ago

DBRXUXRNewcomer

Enforce accessibility standards for brand palettesIdea Submitted

Due to how you’ve incorporated my company’s brand palette, the ‘Start’ button to create a PowerForm is almost completely invisible. I tried Ctrl+F on the page to find ‘New’ or ‘Create,’ which obviously didn’t work, so I had to consult your documentation to find the name of the button before using Ctrl+F ‘start’ to finally locate it. The same goes for other key action buttons on the site - ‘cancel’ looks like the only enabled button, not ‘Ok’. This is a huge accessibility issue, and just bad UX. It should be straightforward to support a customer's brand color palette while still enforcing accessibility standards. Our brand palette contains many colors that meet those standards, and it should be fairly trivial to auto-reject incompatible colors and request that the admin select a replacement color from the palette. Or even better, auto-select more appropriate alternatives for them.

Forum|Forum|21 days ago

BarbaraNewcomer

correct an envelope option only shows recipient's view - I need my view (sender) to correct fields I enteredIdea Submitted

trouble ticket opened because there was no “correct” option per detailed instructions on how to correct an envelope sent but not yet signed by recipient. once tech support updated Docusign to show me the “correct” option, it only showed the recipient’s view to correct…..I need to see my view - the sender’s - to correct some fields I input…… tech support said this was not an option...l I need this option, otherwise I have to delete the envelope, RETYPE alllllll the fields again, advise the recipient that I have to delete the first envelope and send a NEW one HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPP I really don’t understand why I can’t correct my fields!!!!!!!

Forum|Forum|22 days ago

Jana JNewcomer

Transfer completed document to a different user, rather than the sender.Idea Submitted

I need User 1 to create a specific envelope and send out, however I need the completed document to go to User 2 only as the responses within the document will be confidential, so I do not want the completed document returned to User 1. Also, this is for one specific document only, I do not want this to be a general setting for all documents that User 1 sends, only for this specific document or template.

Forum|Forum|22 days ago

orsusNewcomer

Stickers for fields in scroll barIdea Submitted

It would be much more helpful to have the sticker labels showing the fields you have on pages in the two vertical scrollbars as well as the page preview vertical scroll section (i.e., on the page where you add the fields for a document before sending an envelope).

Forum|Forum|22 days ago