Get Started
Get Inspiration
Groups
Events
Ideas
Release Hub

Start a Post
Log in

Docusign Momentum 2026 | New York City

(Wed, May 20, 12:00 PM)

Home
Ideas

Ideas

Want to shape the future of Docusign? Add your ideas for dream features and upvote others you love.

Featured topics

How to Use the Ideas Feature

What you need to know about Docusign Community IdeasThis guide will walk you through the process of sharing your ideas, voting on existing ideas, and...

Forum|Forum|1 year ago

19450

Update on the status of submitted ideas

Hi everyone! We’ve heard your questions about the status of submitted ideas in the Ideas forum.Internally, the Docusign team is actively reviewing you...

Forum|Forum|10 months ago

4655

Filter by Idea status

Filter by category

811 Ideas

Newest First

Most Replies

Most Votes

muslimamirovNewcomer

Biometric Human Authorship Attestation for Senders – Face ID / Fingerprint Confirmation Before Sending Sensitive Documents or emailIdea Submitted

In the era of widespread AI tools (LLM), there is growing concern in legal, compliance, and financial workflows about whether the content of an agreement, contract draft, or official correspondence was genuinely written and reviewed by a human — or largely generated by AI.Currently, DocuSign excels at verifying the recipient (signer) through biometric authentication, liveness detection, and ID verification. However, there is no equivalent mechanism for the sender/author to cryptographically attest that they personally created or reviewed the content before sending.Proposed Feature:Add an optional (or configurable per template/account) pre-send biometric attestation step for the sender:When the sender finishes editing a document/envelope (especially for high-stakes items like contracts, NDAs, payment instructions, legal correspondence, or compliance documents), they are prompted to confirm authorship with a quick on-device biometric check: Face ID, Touch ID / Fingerprint, or facial recognition with liveness detection. Upon successful confirmation, the system generates a cryptographically signed attestation (e.g., “Human Authored + Biometric Attestation”) containing: Hash of the document/content at the time of confirmation Timestamp Sender’s identity (linked to their verified account) Proof that a live human performed the biometric confirmation (without storing raw biometric data — using on-device secure enclave where possible) This attestation is embedded into the envelope as metadata, visible in the audit trail, and can be verified by the recipient or auditors.Key Benefits:Provides positive proof of human authorship in addition to existing AI content labeling. Strengthens non-repudiation and trust in sensitive communications. Helps organizations comply with emerging regulations (e.g., EU AI Act requirements for transparency on AI-generated content) by offering clear evidence that a real person stood behind the text. Low friction: the step can be enabled only for sensitive templates or high-value envelopes, taking just 2–3 seconds. Privacy-friendly: biometric processing happens on-device; only a cryptographic token is attached.This feature would complement DocuSign’s existing strong identity verification for signers and position DocuSign as a leader in trust and provenance for the entire agreement lifecycle — not just the signing moment.I believe this would be especially valuable for law firms, banks, corporate legal departments, and any organization dealing with regulated or high-risk documents.No compensation or recognition is requested — I simply want this idea to have a chance to live and be considered. I think I will purchase license to use it in my Outlook also :).

Forum|Forum|11 days ago

Artep6509New Voice

The width of the right side panel needs to be adjustable to allow viewing of file namesIdea Submitted

A typical DocuSign envelop (ie.: AGM processing) can contain quite large amount of documents, not just one or a few.In order to allow the user to review & self-check that all documents that have been included in an envelop actually have a signature pad positioned, the user needs to be able to identify and click through the file names successively as they appear in the right side panel.Currently, it is impossible to see more that 20-some caracters as the right side panel is very narrow and the width cannot be adjusted.This prevents the creator and reviewer from effectively and securely working through the list of files successively to ..position (copy/paste) the required signature pads in multipage documents. (Long contracts, financial statement, long minutes, etc..) review+check if all files have the “signature” pads correctly positioned before sending the envelope slow down the reviewer as it is impossible to see more of the file names. The width of the right side panel should be adjustable to at least triple of what it is today.Only showing the first 20-some caracters of file names is very insufficient to correctly identify which file precisely has been processed and/or reviewed.This negatively impacts the efficienty of the creator of the envelop and the reviewer.Thanks for considering an update to the right side panel and making it’s width adjustable.Krgds, Petra LAHR

Forum|Forum|11 days ago

NBKPRNewcomer

Webform Preview Next PageIdea Submitted

To Whom It May Concern: Please program the Webform Preview the ability to view all pages without having to fill in all the required information. When creating a webform and trying to preview page 2 and beyond, I am required to fill in the required information before proceeding which slows down the creative process.

Forum|Forum|11 days ago

momathewsonNewcomer

Verify or Download permissions for Users (Profile, Groups, Agreement Sets, etc)Idea Submitted

After configuring the permissions by User, Group, Agreement Set, etc -- it would be helpful to be able to verify the permission on an Agreement or User. “Who sees What” function. Download permissions to a CSV -- one user per line -- would be helpful. Ability to check an Agreement -- “Who can see/edit?” Thanks,Mike Mathewson

Forum|Forum|11 days ago

MschneiderNewcomer

Mark-Up Tool upgradesParked

Love the Idea of the Mark-up Tool but needs a few advancements.Line option - make available for recipients also (put the option under the comments option.) Move the Mark-up option (while in recipients hands) from the [Other Actions] button to under Add Comments icon. Currently if recipient adds Mark-up to document, next signer cannot visually see what was covered. Within the document, wherever there was a Mark-up added: add an Icon to the left of that Mark-up and add a feature where the next signer can click on that icon and the mark-up will briefly disappear. This will allow all parties to view the original language. While other parties can edit other people’s mark-ups, you can delete all, change and revise, however, you can only change or revise within the size of the original mark-up’s box size. Allow this to be resized. Require all signers to initial mark-up. Any Changes to mark-up, needs to be rerouted to all who have not seen. (similar to the collaborative option of text fields) Allow any user to reject just the Mark-up...or allow it to be deleted from another signer Allow SENDER to change mark-up formatting if they want, particularly Font Color.

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

KipPNewcomer

Bulk Send with Variable dataIdea Submitted

I know that a lot of users would benefit by being able to send out the same document to multiple recipients adding variable data to the document, like a mail merge. It would save hours upon hours of time.

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

JenIdeNewcomer

The Signature Tag must match the size of the signature appliedIdea Submitted

PLEASE please please update the signature tag to match the size of the signature applied. The suggested fix when someone else asked this was to adopt the signature size. That is NOT what I want. I want the current part 11 compliant signature to stay the same size and format. I just want the colored tags on the document to match that size! Too may people end up applying illegible signatures which brings into question the compliance aspect of the signature that is being paid extra for.

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

legalcontractsConversation Starter

Enhancement Request - Create an Add Note button in Agreement Desk Overview TabIdea Submitted

Please create an Add Note button in the Overview tab of an Agreement Desk Request. We need the ability to add general notes/status updates and have them appear in the Activity Feed. These notes don’t require action by or notice to specific people so the Send Message does not apply. Being required to Send Message to add a general note to the Activity Feed creates unnecessary steps, 1) drafting an email to yourself or shared mailbox, 2) opening and deleting the email from your inbox, and 3) clutters up the Activity Feed - when all we want to do is enter short notes providing updates. We have the ability to do this in our current tool so this feels like a step backward for us. This is another lacking feature that we did not see in a demo and did not have access to a sandbox to test prior to purchase. ia the Send Message button.

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

jros3000New Voice

Agreement Desk/Requests - Support multiple documents when sending requestIdea Submitted

Agreement Desk/Requests is more or less useless for us unless you support multiple files in each attachment box. I can’t believe that we are limited to single file upload in 2026.I.e. would be great if you ensured that a requester can attach multiple documents to a request.

Forum|Forum|12 days ago

Hengfeng GeHero

about validate whether the sender drag one or more signatures for every signerExisting Functionality

Hello Ideas team,We advice all of our customer migrate to new send view as this document told:https://www.docusign.com/blog/developers/esignature-rest-api-embedded-correct-view-updated?msockid=13eac2ad5d496fc10dc3d62c5c416ee9and also can find the document:https://developers.docusign.com/docs/esign-rest-api/reference/envelopes/envelopeviews/createsender/we find the setting as below:{ "returnUrl": "<url>", // URL required "viewAccess": "envelope", // required "settings": { "startingScreen": "Prepare", // (default) or "Tagger" "sendButtonAction": "send", // (default), "redirect" "showBackButton": "true", // (default), "false" "backButtonAction": "previousPage", // (default), "redirect" "showHeaderActions": "true", // (default), "false" "showDiscardAction": "true", // (default), "false" "lockToken": token_value, "recipientSettings": { "showEditRecipients": "true", // (default), "false" "showContactsList": "true" // (default), "false" }, "documentSettings": { "showEditDocuments": "true", // (def,ault), "false" "showEditDocumentVisibility": "true" // (default), "false" "showEditPages": "true", // (default), "false" }, "taggerSettings": { "paletteSections": "default", // (default), "none", "custom" "paletteDefault": "custom" // "merge", "notary", "seals", // "smartContracts", "annotations", // "smartSections" } } }}Now the customer want add validate parameter for send button. We can define paramter for signature in the setting, so it will check whether the sender have drag signture for every signer before send. sometime the sender forget drag signature for other signer except the first one. if the sender not drag, will throw the error that he need to drag the signature for which signer. FreeLink/甫连信息🌍 DocuSign Partner | Partner Profile🌟 The only DocuSign Partner globally certified as both a Certified eSignature Administrator and eSignature Technical Consultant🏆 DocuSign 2024 APAC Reseller Growth Partner of the Year💡 Ranked #1 in the OG All Star category in DocuSign Community Wrapped 2024📊 DocuSign Community Leaderboard Top 5 contributor🚀 Expertise in DocuSign integrations with on-premises systems for leading enterprises across various industries🔗 Connect with me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gehengfeng/

Forum|Forum|13 days ago

Michael.HoffmanConversation Starter

Enhancement request for metadata to be passed between envelopes when using the Copy buttonExisting Functionality

When you use the copy button it would be valuable to be able to see which envelope the new envelope was copied from. In my opinion, something should tie those envelopes to each other for reference. We can’t find any ties between them even via the API and metadata. It doesn’t show anything in the envelope history or certificate of completion noting that the envelope was copied (yet).

Forum|Forum|13 days ago

echesherNewcomer

Send an envelope with high priorityIdea Submitted

It would be great if I could send an envelope for signature/completion marked as high priority.

Forum|Forum|13 days ago

ClaudiaKNewcomer

Info Mail to signees if correction to an envelope occurIdea Submitted

We realized that within the correction function the sender of the envelope is able to add textfields. Even, if any signee already signed the document, this is possible. Therefore, as the signee will not be able to realize that there are any additions made to the already signed document, we would suggest, that in this case the signees will be informed about that correction by mail.

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

sgeedipallyNewcomer

Request For Enhancement - Adding Recipient IP address to JSON Connect EventsIdea Submitted

We want raise enhancement request for adding RecipientIPAddress attribute as part of JSON connect event through Webhook. Currently this attribute is as part of XML event that follow SOAP API. But we want that field to be included in the Docusign JSON event that follows REST API schema.

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

TSCNewcomer

Request for Enhancement – Enable Envelope Preview Without AssignmentIdea Submitted

Hello, Based on the case below, the DocuSign case manager recommended creating an enhancement to override the code change introduced in the December 2025 release. This update disrupted our workflow because it no longer allows signers to simply preview envelopes on behalf of a signing group, as was previously possible.The proposed solution is to implement a workaround or provide a way to preview envelopes without signing or being assigned to them. Previously, our process allowed signers to preview the document for QA purposes, verify the data, and then sign once confirmed. Now, they must view, review, and reassign the envelope to someone else for a later signature, which adds unnecessary complexity.Case #: 16469134Subject: DocuSign Preview Behavior Changed – Requires Signing Before ViewingI hope others are encountering this as well.Best regards,MM

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

HannahPayworks.caNew Voice

Webform Date Fields - Allow RestrictionsIdea Submitted

We are capturing date fields on a Web Form as part of a Maestro Workflow. We are pushing the date fields collected into Salesforce. Salesforce has validation rules on some fields that will not allow dates that are in the past.This will cause the Maestro Workflow to fail upon SF Update and/or the Salesforce processing to fail.We would like to see the ability to allow restrictions on the Date field (e.g. current and future dates only)

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

AC815New Voice

create a way to see the original owner of a envelop AND who it was transferred toIdea Submitted

When doing a bulk “transfer envelopes now” it would be very helpful to see who the original owner of the envelop was in addition to who they were transferred to using the Action button

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

Jake FasciaActive Voice

Enhance Reporting to select and display specific text/tab fields from envelopes as columnsIdea Submitted

Similar to Envelope Custom Fields and the way they show up on Envelope Reports, we would regular text/tab fields to also have the option to display on reports, as we have key identify features like ‘Loan Number’ or ‘Member Number’ we would like to include. This should also extend to Powerforms, as we’re currently utilizing this for most of our processes, which makes ECF not an option.

Forum|Forum|15 days ago

MinTNewcomer

Setup expiry notification based on X date and X duration of agreementIdea Submitted

The expiry notification is setup based on expiry date only. It would be great if I can setup the notification based on date and duration of agreement.

Forum|Forum|16 days ago

Hengfeng GeHero

Allow per-recipient redirect URL for email signing (similar to embedded signing redirect control)Idea Submitted

Description:Currently, redirect URLs can only be configured at the Account or Brand level through the “Destination URL” setting, or dynamically specified when generating an embedded signing view.However, for email-based signing, there is no option to define a per-recipient redirect URL when creating an envelope via API.In some business scenarios — for example, our customer needs to have external merchants sign agreements — they would like each signer to be redirected to a custom application form or confirmation page after signing.We have tried: Embedding the form link in the email body → but since the domain differs from DocuSign’s, this often triggers mail security gateways and increases the chance of messages being quarantined or blocked. Using the Brand-level Destination URL → but this applies globally across all envelopes and recipients, which is too broad and affects other workflows. Therefore, we suggest enabling the ability to specify a recipient-level redirect URL at the time of envelope creation, similar to how embedded signing supports returnUrl.Additionally, it would be very helpful if this redirect could be triggered immediately upon completion of signing, even for standard email-based flows — to provide a smoother, more seamless end-user experience.Benefits: Enables finer-grained control for different workflows or recipients; Reduces email deliverability risks by avoiding external links in the signing email body; Provides a more integrated experience between DocuSign and customer business systems. FreeLink/甫连信息🌍 DocuSign Partner | Partner Profile🌟The only DocuSign Partner globally with two Certified eSignature Technical Consultants🏆 DocuSign 2025 APAC Growth Engine Partner of the Year💡 Ranked #1 in the OG All Star category in DocuSign Community Wrapped 2024📊 DocuSign Community Leaderboard Top 5 contributor🚀 Expertise in DocuSign integrations with on-premises systems for leading enterprises across various industries🔗 Connect with me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gehengfeng📬 For business inquiries, feel free to connect via :WeChat/微信: +86 1381880287WhatsApp: +65 97796938

Forum|Forum|18 days ago

Hengfeng GeHero

Allow customers to directly revoke SMS subscriptions online (without Support case requirement)Idea Submitted

Title:Description:According to the current process, if an SMS subscription needs to be revoked within 7 days, customers must open a Support Case and wait for the Docusign Support team to process the request.For customers with large and growing envelope volumes, this creates several challenges: Users may accidentally subscribe SMS authentication, but they are not immediately aware of the mistake. By the time they realize it, the SMS subscription link has often expired, making recovery more difficult. Submitting a Support Case for each incorrect subscription introduces significant operational workload, slows down business processes, and reduces overall system usability. We would like to propose adding the ability for account administrators to directly revoke SMS subscriptions through the Docusign Admin Portal or via API — without requiring intervention from the Support team.Benefits of this enhancement: Dramatically improves efficiency for high-volume enterprise customers; Reduces reliance on manual Support cases and shortens the response cycle; Minimizes business disruption caused by accidental SMS subscription issues; Enhances the overall self-service capabilities of the Docusign platform. Providing an online, self-service revocation option would significantly improve the customer experience and reduce operational friction for organizations that rely heavily on SMS authentication. FreeLink/甫连信息🌍 DocuSign Partner | Partner Profile🌟The only DocuSign Partner globally with two Certified eSignature Technical Consultants🏆 DocuSign 2025 APAC Growth Engine Partner of the Year💡 Ranked #1 in the OG All Star category in DocuSign Community Wrapped 2024📊 DocuSign Community Leaderboard Top 5 contributor🚀 Expertise in DocuSign integrations with on-premises systems for leading enterprises across various industries🔗 Connect with me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gehengfeng📬 For business inquiries, feel free to connect via :WeChat/微信: +86 1381880287WhatsApp: +65 97796938

Forum|Forum|18 days ago

JshearerConversation Starter

Allow users to upload "printed and signed" copy on behalf of external partyParked

Currently, if a external party (client, prospect etc) is signing a document, they have the ability to Print and Sign which then gives them the ability to upload it back. Most never go back through that process and just email it over after its either signed through a “wet signature” or through whatever program they use internally. So our process in Docusign basically skips and we have to complete it through a separate manual process. If we had the ability to “upload signed copy” on their behalf/for them we could continue the process including all the triggers that things are complete, pulling the document in etc. This is not limited to triggering from Salesforce, but in our case, it would greatly improve usage in Salesforce rather than having 50%+ starting in Salesforce and then ending in the same ol manual way, skipping all the benefits of using the Salesforce integration in the first place (status updates, automatic attachment etc).

Forum|Forum|18 days ago

PrashanthiNewcomer

Adjusting height of standard/custom fieldsIdea Submitted

Most of the document are legally approved documents and should not be edited. Requesting for a Docusign enhancement where the user can adjust the height of the standard and/or custom fields to enable developers to use fields in limited/narrow spaces without the fields overlap the document text.

Forum|Forum|18 days ago

MMackeyNewcomer

File Name Sort Feature in NavigatorIdea Submitted

We desperately need a sort feature for file name (i.e. alphabetically) in the navigator completed contract repository. Currently the sort feature only exists for execution date but my company really needs the sort feature enabled for file name too - this would greatly enhance our ability to organize our contracts for quick access and reference. Please add this capability ASAP!!

Forum|Forum|18 days ago

brbaca35New Voice

Enhancement Request: Fax Capability with Document Visibility EnabledIdea Submitted

When document visibility is turned on for any organization, the ability to fax envelopes is disabled.I would like to propose an enhancement that allows fax functionality to remain available when document visibility is enabled.This improvement would greatly benefit our organization by enabling us to send multiple documents in the same envelope with the document visibility selection options, and still fax envelopes as needed to support our customers.Thank you for considering this request.Brandy

Forum|Forum|18 days ago