Skip to main content

    Filter by Idea status

    Filter by category

    1017 Ideas

    RachelKLNew Voice

    Feature Request: Template-Level Control for PDF vs. Link Delivery to Support Data Privacy & Industry ComplianceIdea Submitted

    DescriptionIn today’s environment - where data privacy, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance standards are increasing across all industries, it has become critical for organizations to control how completed DocuSign documents are delivered on a per-template basis, not just at the account level.Currently, DocuSign only allows PDF vs. Link delivery settings at the account level.This creates significant challenges for organizations that manage different types of documents with different data-exposure risks.Why Template-Level Delivery MattersMany industries regularly send documents that contain PII, PHI, financial data, employee data, and other sensitive information. For these types of documents, Link Delivery is the safer and more compliant option because:• Access requires authentication into a DocuSign account• Documents are not transmitted as unsecured PDFs• Exposure risk is reduced in the event of an email compromise or downstream data breachConversely, many other templates, such as vendor contracts, NDAs, media agreements, or documents without PII—do not need link-level protection and are more efficiently consumed as PDFs.Real-World ImpactThis limitation affects:• Financial institutions (loan docs, ACH forms, identity verification)• HR and payroll departments (I-9s, tax forms, onboarding docs)• Healthcare and insurance (claims, patient forms, PHI-containing documents)• Enterprise legal teams (sensitive amendments, personnel agreements)• Any organization with mixed-risk document typesToday, companies must choose one single delivery method for the entire account - even though the sensitivity of documents varies dramatically.Security & Compliance RisksWithout template-level control:• Sensitive PII documents may be forced to send as PDFs, creating unnecessary exposure• Low-risk templates may be forced into Link Delivery, creating inefficiency and confusion• Corporations must invent manual workarounds (file padding, extra pages, etc.) to force the preferred method—none of which are scalable or secure• The current model does not align with modern privacy frameworks (SOC 2, ISO, GDPR, HIPAA, GLBA)Proposed EnhancementDocuSign should allow each template to specify its own final document delivery method:• PDF Delivery• Link Delivery (Account Login Required)This empowers organizations to:• Meet compliance requirements• Reduce data-breach exposure• Simplify workflows• Eliminate workaround solutions• Better support enterprise-level governance and security needsConclusionA template-level delivery setting would be a major step forward for organizations that rely on DocuSign as an enterprise system of agreement. With data privacy and cybersecurity threats rising across every industry, having granular control over document delivery isn’t just convenient, it is essential.

    Feature Request: Add an “Expired Agreements” Section to the Envelopes Sidebar NavigationIdea Submitted

    Currently, the Envelopes sidebar provides clear visibility into nearly every stage of the document lifecycle—from draft, to sent, to completed, and even Expiring Soon. However, once an agreement has officially expired, it effectively disappears from meaningful visibility. These expired agreements remain accessible only briefly, persisting in the Agreement Activity feed for as long as it takes roughly five new agreements to arrive. After that, they are no longer surfaced in any structured or discoverable way.This gap creates a significant missed opportunity for users.Expired agreements are often a valuable signal, representing prospects who were previously engaged but did not complete the signing process in time. Without a dedicated location for these agreements, users lose an important touchpoint for follow-up, analysis, and potential reengagement.Adding an “Expired Agreements” section to the Envelopes navigation would: Complete the document lifecycle representation within the platform. Every major stage—except expiration—is already accounted for. Improve user experience and workflow efficiency, ensuring expired agreements remain accessible and easy to review. Enable strategic reengagement, helping users identify and follow up with parties who demonstrated prior interest. Create continuity and clarity, especially for users handling large volumes of agreements where expiration is a meaningful status. By introducing a dedicated folder or view for expired agreements, the platform would deliver a more comprehensive lifecycle management experience and unlock a high-value resource for users looking to recover missed opportunities.